Knowledge: To Manage or Not to Manage

In this issue of Cutter Benchmark Review, we focus on a topic that has been in and out of the limelight since the mid-1990s when it became one of the hottest topics in boardrooms, management publications, and consulting briefs: knowledge management (KM). Perhaps in response to the realization that the downsizing and delayering that followed business process reengineering's rise to prominence engendered significant loss of organizational knowledge, business leaders - aided by consulting firms - concluded that institutional systems must be developed to preserve and communicate organizational knowledge in the face of change and over time. If knowledge can be used as a source of competitive advantage, then it is imperative for a firm to have a solid grasp on what it knows, be aware of who knows this information, and be able to figure out what else it should know that it has yet to learn.

Password Protected Cutter Consortium clients, please log in:


This document is available to Cutter Consortium Resource Center clients only.
If you would like further information about how to become a client, please contact us at +1 781 648 8700 or sales@cutter.com.